Why traditional blade preparation processes carry unnecessary risk
vs. Manual sanding and hand finishing: Slow and aggressive, with no process record and no repeatability guarantee. On composite blades, sanding risks fibre damage. Finish quality varies between operators and cycles, making bond strength inconsistent. Hand arm vibration risk is present throughout.
vs. Chemical stripping: Effective at removing paint but the compliance burden is significant. Multi-stage handling, solvent residue clean-up, COSHH controls and PPE all add time and complexity. For aluminium blades going to dye penetrant NDT, chemical residues in surface micro-cracks can mask defects and compromise results.
vs. Dry blasting: Cannot degrease simultaneously, so a separate cleaning stage is always required before or after. On metallic blades, dry blasting closes surface cracks rather than opening them, which is the wrong outcome for NDT preparation.
Find out how wet blasting compares with other finishing processes