The problem with the edge 'as ground'
After grinding, the cutting edge has three problems simultaneously. The size of the edge radius is unstable. The shape across the rake and clearance faces is uncontrolled. And the surface finish on both faces carries grinding damage that undermines coating adhesion.
Each affects tool performance independently. Together, they determine whether the coating bonds, whether the edge survives the first cut at rated speed, and whether performance is consistent across the batch.
The challenge is that size, shape, and finish all need to be controlled at the same time, to tight tolerances, across production volumes. A process that controls radius but not profile produces a tool that performs differently depending on the material it cuts. A process that achieves the right profile on short tools but loses consistency along the length of longer geometries creates batch variation that is difficult to diagnose and expensive to correct.
Drag and stream finishing machines rotate tools through a drum of abrasive media. Media density varies with depth in the drum, so tools experience different abrasive contact along their length. The edge radius at the tip of a long end mill or drill will differ from the shank end. These processes also contact the full tool profile simultaneously, which limits independent control of rake face and clearance face removal.
Wet blasting directs a programmable nozzle at the tool. Blast angle, pressure, media selection, nozzle distance, and gun velocity are all independently set per recipe. The rake and clearance faces receive the treatment the process specifies. The result is a defined edge radius, at a defined K-factor profile, held to ±2µm tolerance across the batch. K-factor describes how the hone is split between the rake and clearance faces: K = 1 is a symmetrical hone, above 1 a trumpet profile, below 1 a waterfall.
Find out how wet blasting works